![]() ![]() ![]() So you mean to tell me that any game that doesn't have multiplayer, is because the devs are lazy? Multiplayer isn't needed in every game. Up to 3 friends can join you in the main campaign, in Daybreak, or in Heartland. They got all their early access money and there was no more incentive.Įarly access was the dumbest thing Valve could have ever done and I honestly blame them for this huge decline in the quality of games over the last couple years. FOUR-PLAYER CO-OP SURVIVE WITH YOUR FRIENDS With co-op multiplayer support, you can visit your friends’ communities to help them out and earn rewards for your own community. I don't care if it cost 1 dollar or 100 dollars. ![]() I paid 5 dollars for this game and I'm almost tempted to charge back just on principles alone. I find the base difficulty quite easy so unless you're trying to up your difficulty, co-op rarely is worth it outside of trading. In State of Decay 2 you control a group of. They can spit out all the generic excuses they want but it's pretty damn obvious. If you find state of decay challenging to play on your own, it's great for that. State of Decay 2 is an upcoming zombie apocalypse survival simulator where the emphasis lies in scavenging, base building, and social management. All of this is something you find in multiplayer games, and for good reason. Real time passing even when you're offline so the cpu characters can essentially starve and morale can drop even if you aren't playing. Originally posted by Monostatic:There's no multiplayer because the developers are lazy and just wanted their money rather than spend the extra time adding the feature that the game was intended to have in the beginning. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |